I thought this article was interesting and thought you might too.
”The strategy is this: Let’s call Intelligent Design scientific information, and let’s make sure that teachers can teach that scientific information,” Simon said, adding that his organization would sue if the bill became law and teachers began proselytizing in class.
Yes, how dare those ID science proponents do science and want teachers to be allowed to present science in science class instead of dogmatic Darwinian materialism! Boo! Hiss!
But, seriously, I would support Simon if teachers started proselytizing, because I don’t think it has a place in the classroom either. I fail to see what it has to do with the science of ID, except for the usual straw man argument that Dawkinsists always use without even a hint of the irony involved. I guess that’s what happens when you have such a strong attachment to a dogmatic worldview that will admit no dissent.