Recently, Dr. William Dembski gave a talk in Oklahoma about ID. He was invited to speak, although the accounts that I’ve read make it sound more like an ambush.
One such account sounds rather vicious indeed. The account is obviously biased against Dembski. For example, when Dembski gives a good answer, the questioner “Didn’t understand how Dembski ‘operates’. She let him twist around (sic) on her…” This blogger also recounts some quote mines of Dembski in order to portray him in a negative light after the fact.
If that weren’t enough, the blogger seems genuinely pleased with herself for the underhanded tactic of poisoning the well by attacking the commenters on Dembski’s blog. So, either he censures comments and is criticized for hiding, or he doesn’t and is criticized for what others say? This is ridiculous. Of course, we shouldn’t be surprised at the antics of someone who seems positively giddy over heckling Dembski:
Student after student after student– It turned into a party. The audience heckled Demsbki when he wouldnt answer questions. We were laughing before, during, and after his answers.
This, is how materialists hope to win the day, by attacking en masse with underhanded comments and ambushes. It should be about science, but when you don’t have science on your side, you have to resort to something, right?