They Want to Have Their Cake and Eat it Too

Darwinists deny the design that resides in living things without a second thought most of the time.  Then, they write papers that talk about the design of this function or that function.  When confronted with this fact, they try to hide behind the argument to bad design.

Take the human eye for instance.  We are told that our eye is suboptimal, because the blood vessels lie on the wrong side of the retina, thus creating a blind spot.  Nevermind the fact that some studies have shown that this allows an increased blood flow which is necessary for our level of visual acuity, that’s not the point here.  The point is that ID science is supposedly wrong, because the Intelligent Designer created a bad design.

Hmmm, intersting.  I thought it wasn’t designed, but now I’m supposed to abandon ID science because the design is bad?  The materialists want to have their cake and eat it too.  They want to be able to claim no design meaning ID science is false.  They also want to claim that when things are designed, they are badly designed, so ID science is false.  Of course, this is so ridiculous that I’m constantly amazed that they seem to get away with it.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s