Following up on my ID predictions thread, I thought this article about the failed evolutionary model would fit in nicely. There’s a good discussion about how ID fits the data better than evolution:
For example, vertebrates, sea urchins, insects, and various other invertebrate groups all use the same regulatory genes to control growth of their widely diverse types of limbs, but it is not thought that their common ancestor had a common limb. Similarly, vertebrates, insects, and jellyfish use similar master control genes to control the development of their widely different eyes, but their alleged common ancestor is not thought to have had a common type of eye. In these cases, living animal groups would NOT be expected to have inherited their genetic “tool kits” from a common ancestor because there is no reason to believe that the common ancestor was using that genetic toolkit for some common body part.
0 responses so far ↓
There are no comments yet...Kick things off by filling out the form below.